Abdulrasheed Maina, former Chairman of the defunct Pension Reform Task Team, continued his court absenteeism on Thursday, February 26 and by so doing, aborted his trial-within-trial before Justice Abubakar Kutigi of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, Asokoro, to determine the admissibility of his extrajudicial statements to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
The EFCC is prosecuting Maina, the first defendant, alongside Ann Igwe Olachi, a civil servant, on a nine-count charge, bordering on receipt of stolen funds to the tune of N738, 612,019.99 (Seven Hundred and Thirty-eight Million, Six Hundred and Twelve Thousand, Nineteen Naira, Nineteen Kobo).
They were arraigned in 2019. The commencement of the trial-within-trial was botched at the start of Thursday’s proceedings when Maina’s lead counsel, A.I. Lemu, SAN, informed the court that he was new in the case and did not even know the charges against his client, and asked for an adjournment of the sitting. “I am coming into this matter new. I don’t even have the charges. I don’t have the history of this case. I was briefed on the phone to take over the case,” he said. He asked for two weeks’ adjournment to get himself acquainted with the facts of the case.
While noting that there has been a high turnover of lawyers for the first defendant, Lemu SAN promised the court that he would see out the trial. “Hopefully, I will be the last lawyer to appear in this case,” he said.
The visibly angry judge, in response, threatened yet again to revoke Maina’s bail and identified the new defence counsel’s antics as attempts at making a mockery of his court. However, the judge, in the interest of a fair hearing, gave the defence counsel the two weeks’ relief he sought.
“If your client cannot come to court, I will revoke his bail and let them go and get him. If you don’t know the history of the case, go and get the records, and I am not going to wait for you to do that. I would not allow a senior advocate to come and make a mockery of this court. The last time he appeared in court was more than three years ago. I am fed up with this case. I’ve been in this profession for over 35 years. I have never seen a case like this.
“I will give you two weeks to study the matter, and for the trial-within-trial to commence. If he is not in court during the trial-within-trial, I will revoke his bail.”
Justice Kutigi recalled that Maina was released from prison on account of his two-year conviction for money laundering on February 25, 2025, yet has not made himself available in court for his trial since then.
The prosecution counsel made two applications, one for the court to strike out the objection of the defence to the voluntariness of the statements of the defendants, since the defence team could not produce the first defendant in court for the sub-trial and for the order of the court for the first defendant to pay for the cost incurred by the prosecution in transporting to court, the equipment for replaying the video recording of the defendants’ extra-judicial statements.
The counsel for the first defendant, on his part, made an application against the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the case, on the ground that Maina has already been convicted and served out his jail time. The prosecution counsel, while acknowledging the application, promised to file his response at the next adjourned date.
The court adjourned the matter till March 9, 2026, for trial-within-trial and hearing on the court’s jurisdiction on the matter. #SECURITYNEWSALERT.COM
