In a recent court proceeding, Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), reportedly informed the presiding judge that he does not intend to open his defence, asserting that “he has no case” to answer.
According to reports of the courtroom exchange, the judge reminded Mr Kanu of a prior judgment that affirmed he had a case to answer, contradicting his current position.
When Kanu cited a Court of Appeal ruling that had previously granted him bail, the judge reportedly countered that a subsequent Supreme Court judgment had nullified the appellate court’s decision, thereby validating the continuation of the trial.
The judge cautioned Kanu on the legal implications of his stance, noting that a refusal to open a defence would mean the prosecution’s evidence and submissions would stand uncontested before the court.
In response to the development, the judge adjourned the case until November 6, 2025. Kanu was advised to use the time to seek further legal interpretation of his position. The court stipulated that if Kanu’s stance remains unchanged by the next hearing, he must present his position in a written document to the court, after which the court will proceed to pronounce judgment.
Kanu is facing multiple charges, including terrorism and treasonable felony.
